JEL classification

Journal of Economic Literature Classification (10696) L - Industrial Organization (954) L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise (52) L31 - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs (17)
Number of items at this level: 17.
Article
  • Berger, Michael, Six, Eva, Czypionka, Thomas (2024). Policy implications of heterogeneous demand reactions to changes in cost-sharing: patient-level evidence from Austria. Social Science & Medicine, 340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116488 picture_as_pdf
  • Berry, James, Fischer, Gregory, Guiteras, Raymond (2020). Eliciting and utilizing willingness to pay: evidence from field trials in northern Ghana. Journal of Political Economy, 128(4), 1436 - 1473. https://doi.org/10.1086/705374 picture_as_pdf
  • Besley, Timothy, Malcomson, James M. (2018). Competition in public service provision: the role of not-for-profit providers. Journal of Public Economics, 162(S1), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.04.004
  • Dang, Canh Thien, Owens, Trudy (2020). Does transparency come at the cost of charitable services? Evidence from investigating British charities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 172, 314 - 343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.02.020 picture_as_pdf
  • Gregg, Paul, Grout, Paul A., Ratcliffe, Anita, Smith, Sarah, Windmeijer, Frank (2011). How important is pro-social behaviour in the delivery of public services? Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 758-766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.002
  • Hutton, Will, Lee, Neil (2012). The city and the cities: finance, ownership and the geography of recession. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 5(3), 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rss018
  • Lapointe, Simon, Perroni, Carlo, Scharf, Kimberley, Tukiainen, Janne (2018). Does market size matter for charities. Journal of Public Economics, 168, 127-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.10.003 picture_as_pdf
  • O'Shea, Rory P., Allen, Thomas J., Chevalier, Arnaud, Roche, Frank (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994-1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011
  • Orsini, Chiara (2016). Ownership and exit behavior: evidence from the home health care market. Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 16(1), 289-320. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2014-0044
  • Seckinelgin, Hakan (2005). A global disease and its governance: HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa and the agency of NGOs. Global Governance, 11(3), 351-167.
  • Chapter
  • Bloom, Nick, Kretschmer, Tobias, Van Reenen, John (2009). Work-life balance, management practices and productivity. In Freeman, Richard B., Shaw, Kathryn L. (Eds.), International Differences in the Business Practices and Productivity of Firms (pp. 15-54). University of Chicago Press.
  • Conference or Workshop Item
  • Berry, Jim, Fischer, Gregory, Guiteras, Raymond (2010-11-06 - 2010-11-07) Incentive compatibility in the field: a test of the Becker-De Groot-Marschak mechanism [Paper]. The Northeast Universities Development Consortium (NEUDC) conference, Cambridge, United States, USA.
  • Working paper
  • Besley, Timothy, Ghatak, Maitreesh (2003). Competition and incentives with motivated agents. (Theoretical Economics; TE/2003/465 TE/03/465). Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Fischer, Gregory, Berry, James, Guiteras, Raymond (2012). Eliciting and utilizing willingness to pay: evidence from field trials in Northern Ghana. London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Hart, Oliver, Moore, John (1998). Cooperatives vs. outside ownership. (TE 346). Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Scott, Colin, Hopkins, R. (1999). The economics of non-governmental organisations. (DEDPS 15). Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines.
  • Waldinger, Fabian (2009). Peer effects in science: evidence from the dismissal of scientists in Nazi Germany. (CEP Discussion Paper 910). London School of Economics and Political Science. Centre for Economic Performance.