LSE creators

Number of items: 28.
European Institute
  • Komárek, Jan (2015). Constitutional revolutions and the constituent power: a reply to Mark Tushnet. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(4), 1054-1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov060
  • Komárek, Jan (2015). Legal reasoning in EU law. In Arnull, Anthony, Chalmers, Damian (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of EU Law (pp. 2-21). Oxford University Press.
  • Komárek, Jan (2014). Book review: judging Europe’s judges: the legitimacy of the case law of the European Court of Justice edited by Maurice Adams et al.
  • Komárek, Jan (2014). Waiting for the existential revolution in Europe. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(1), 190-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou004
  • Komárek, Jan (2014). National constitutional courts in the European constitutional democracy. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(3), 525-544. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou048
  • Komárek, Jan (2014). Why national constitutional courts should not embrace EU fundamental rights. (LSE Law, Society and Economy working paper series 23/2014). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Komárek, Jan (2013). The place of constitutional courts in the EU. European Constitutional Law Review, 9(03), 420-450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961200123X
  • Komárek, Jan (2013). Reasoning with previous decisions: beyond the doctrine of precedent. American Journal of Comparative Law, 61(1), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2012.0013
  • Komárek, Jan (2012). Reasoning with previous decisions: beyond the doctrine of precedent. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 08-2012). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Komárek, Jan (2012). Reasoning with previous decisions. In Adams, Maurice, Bomhoff, Jacco (Eds.), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (pp. 49-73). Cambridge University Press.
  • Avbelj, Matej, Komárek, Jan (Eds.) (2012). Constitutional pluralism in the European Union and beyond. Hart Publishing.
  • Komárek, Jan (2012). Institutional dimension of constitutional pluralism. In Avbelj, Matej, Komárek, Jan (Eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (pp. 231-248). Hart Publishing.
  • Komárek, Jan (2012). Czech constitutional court playing with matches: the Czech constitutional court declares a judgment of the court of justice of the EU ultra vires; judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12, Slovak Pensions XVII. European Constitutional Law Review, 8(2), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019612000193
  • Komárek, Jan (2011). Judicial lawmaking and precedent in Supreme Courts. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 04-2011). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Komárek, Jan (2010). Institutional dimension of constitutional pluralism. (Eric Stein Working Paper 3/2010). Czech Society for European and Comparative Law.
  • Komárek, Jan (2009). Questioning judicial deliberations. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29(4), 805-826. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqp026
  • Avbelj, Matej, Komárek, Jan (2008). Four visions of constitutional pluralism. European Constitutional Law Review, 4(3), 524-527. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019608005245
  • Avbelj, Matej, Komárek, Jan (2008). Four visions of constitutional pluralism: symposium transcript. European Journal of Legal Studies, 2(1), 325-370.
  • Komárek, Jan (2008). Legal professional privilege and the EU’s fight against money laundering. Civil Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 13-22.
  • Komárek, Jan (2007). European constitutionalism and the European arrest warrant: in search of the limits of "contrapunctual principles". Common Market Law Review, 44(1), 9-40.
  • Komárek, Jan (2007). "In the court(s) we trust?" on the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure. European Law Review, 32(4), 467-491.
  • Komárek, Jan (2007). Infringements in application of community law: some problems and (im)possible solutions. Review of European Administrative Law, 0(UNSPECIFIED), 87-98.
  • Komárek, Jan (2005). European constitutionalism and the European arrest warrant: contrapunctual principles in disharmony. (Jean Monnet working papers 10/05). Jean Monnet Center for International and Regional Economic Law & Justice.
  • Komárek, Jan (2005). Federal elements in the community judicial system: building coherence in the community legal order. Common Market Law Review, 42(1), 9-34.
    • Law School
  • Ashiagbor, Diamond, Bartl, Marija, Caruso, Daniela, Chiti, Edoardo, Costamagna, Francesco, Dani, Marco, Everson, Michelle, Hesselink, Martijn, Komarek, Jan & Mendes, Joana et al (2022). Introducing European Law Open. European Law Open, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2022.12 picture_as_pdf
  • Komárek, Jan (2017). National constitutional courts in the European constitutional democracy: a rejoinder. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 15(3), 815-825. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mox052
  • Komárek, Jan (2015). Constitutional revolutions and the constituent power: a reply to Mark Tushnet. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(4), 1054-1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov060
  • Komárek, Jan (2015). Europe’s democratic imaginary: government by the people, for the people and of the people? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 22(6), 784-788. picture_as_pdf
  • Komárek, Jan (2015). Legal reasoning in EU law. In Arnull, Anthony, Chalmers, Damian (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of EU Law (pp. 2-21). Oxford University Press.
  • Komárek, Jan (2014). Book review: judging Europe’s judges: the legitimacy of the case law of the European Court of Justice edited by Maurice Adams et al.
  • Komárek, Jan (2014). The struggle for legal reform after communism. (Law Society and Economy Working Paper Series). London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2388783
  • Komárek, Jan (2014). Waiting for the existential revolution in Europe. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(1), 190-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou004
  • Komárek, Jan (2014). National constitutional courts in the European constitutional democracy. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(3), 525-544. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou048
  • Komárek, Jan (2014). Why national constitutional courts should not embrace EU fundamental rights. (LSE Law, Society and Economy working paper series 23/2014). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Komárek, Jan (2013). The place of constitutional courts in the EU. European Constitutional Law Review, 9(03), 420-450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961200123X
  • Komárek, Jan (2013). Reasoning with previous decisions: beyond the doctrine of precedent. American Journal of Comparative Law, 61(1), 149-171. https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2012.0013
  • Komárek, Jan (2012). Reasoning with previous decisions: beyond the doctrine of precedent. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 08-2012). London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Komárek, Jan (2012). Reasoning with previous decisions. In Adams, Maurice, Bomhoff, Jacco (Eds.), Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (pp. 49-73). Cambridge University Press.
  • Avbelj, Matej, Komárek, Jan (Eds.) (2012). Constitutional pluralism in the European Union and beyond. Hart Publishing.
  • Komárek, Jan (2012). Institutional dimension of constitutional pluralism. In Avbelj, Matej, Komárek, Jan (Eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (pp. 231-248). Hart Publishing.
  • Komárek, Jan (2012). Czech constitutional court playing with matches: the Czech constitutional court declares a judgment of the court of justice of the EU ultra vires; judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12, Slovak Pensions XVII. European Constitutional Law Review, 8(2), 323-337. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019612000193
  • Komárek, Jan (2011). Judicial lawmaking and precedent in Supreme Courts. (LSE law, society and economy working papers 04-2011). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Komárek, Jan (2010). Institutional dimension of constitutional pluralism. (Eric Stein Working Paper 3/2010). Czech Society for European and Comparative Law.
  • Komárek, Jan (2009). Questioning judicial deliberations. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29(4), 805-826. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqp026
  • Avbelj, Matej, Komárek, Jan (2008). Four visions of constitutional pluralism. European Constitutional Law Review, 4(3), 524-527. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019608005245
  • Avbelj, Matej, Komárek, Jan (2008). Four visions of constitutional pluralism: symposium transcript. European Journal of Legal Studies, 2(1), 325-370.
  • Komárek, Jan (2008). Legal professional privilege and the EU’s fight against money laundering. Civil Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 13-22.
  • Komárek, Jan (2007). European constitutionalism and the European arrest warrant: in search of the limits of "contrapunctual principles". Common Market Law Review, 44(1), 9-40.
  • Komárek, Jan (2007). "In the court(s) we trust?" on the need for hierarchy and differentiation in the preliminary ruling procedure. European Law Review, 32(4), 467-491.
  • Komárek, Jan (2007). Infringements in application of community law: some problems and (im)possible solutions. Review of European Administrative Law, 0(UNSPECIFIED), 87-98.
  • Komárek, Jan (2005). European constitutionalism and the European arrest warrant: contrapunctual principles in disharmony. (Jean Monnet working papers 10/05). Jean Monnet Center for International and Regional Economic Law & Justice.
  • Komárek, Jan (2005). Federal elements in the community judicial system: building coherence in the community legal order. Common Market Law Review, 42(1), 9-34.