LSE creators

Number of items: 16.
2024
  • Auckland, Cressida (2024). Allowing for open debate in medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 50(11), 723 - 724. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2024-110495
  • Auckland, Cressida (2024). Values and disorder in mental capacity law. Cambridge University Press.
  • 2023
  • Auckland, Cressida (2023). Authenticity and identity in adolescent decision-making. Modern Law Review, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12834 picture_as_pdf
  • Auckland, Cressida (2023). Can identity-relative paternalism shift the focus from the principle of autonomy? Journal of Medical Ethics, 49(7), 451 - 452. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109307 picture_as_pdf
  • 2022
  • Auckland, Cressida (2022). Knowing who to trust: women and public health. Journal of Medical Ethics, 48(8), 501 - 503. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108490 picture_as_pdf
  • 2021
  • Auckland, Cressida (2021). A facade of futility. Law Quarterly Review, 137(Jul), 451 - 476. picture_as_pdf
  • Auckland, Cressida (2021). Blackstone's statutes on medical law. Oxford University Press.
  • Auckland, Cressida (2021). Barnsley Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v MSP [2020] EWCOP 26: the need for caution when establishing the wishes of incapacitated patients. Medical Law Review, 29(2), 347 – 358. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwab002 picture_as_pdf
  • 2020
  • Auckland, Cressida, Goold, Imogen (2020). Resolving disagreement: a multi-jurisdictional comparative analysis of disputes about children’s medical care. Medical Law Review, 28(4), 643 - 674. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwaa020 picture_as_pdf
  • Auckland, Cressida, Goold, Imogen (2020). Re-evaluating 'best interests' in the wake of Raqeeb v Barts NHS Foundation Trust & Anors. Modern Law Review, 83(6), 1328 - 1342. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12563 picture_as_pdf
  • Auckland, Cressida Claire, Goold, Imogen (2020). Claiming in contract for wrongful conception. Law Quarterly Review, 136, 45-51. picture_as_pdf
  • 2019
  • Auckland, Cressida, Goold, Imogen (2019). Parental rights, best interests and significant harms who should have the final say over a child's medical care? Cambridge Law Journal, 78(2), 287 - 323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197319000382 picture_as_pdf
  • 2018
  • Auckland, Cressida (2018). Protecting me from my directive: ensuring appropriate safeguards for advance directives in dementia. Medical Law Review, 26(1), 73 - 97. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwx037 picture_as_pdf
  • Auckland, Cressida Claire, Goold, I (2018). Defining the limits of parental authority: Charlie Gard, best interests and the risk of significant harm threshold. Law Quarterly Review, 134(Jan), 37 - 42. picture_as_pdf
  • 2016
  • Auckland, Cressida Claire (2016). Muddying the waters of end of life decision-making: Tracey and the encroachment of law on clinical judgment. Elder Law Journal, 6(3), 264-272.
  • 2015
  • Auckland, Cressida Claire, Keene, A Ruck (2015). More presumptions please? Wishes, feelings and best interests decision-making. Elder Law Journal, 5(3), 293-301.