LSE creators

Number of items: 21.
None
  • Archer, Robin (2018). ‘Quite like ourselves’: opposition to military compulsion during the Great War in the United States and Australia. In Patmore, Greg, Stromquist, Shelton (Eds.), Frontiers of Labor: Comparative Histories of the United States and Australia . University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign campus). Press.
  • Archer, Robin (2016). Labour and liberty: the origins of the conscription referendum. In Archer, Robin, Damousi, Joy, Goot, Murray, Scalmer, Sean (Eds.), The Conscription Conflict and the Great War . Monash University Press.
  • Archer, Robin, Damousi, Joy, Goot, Murray, Scalmer, Sean (Eds.) (2016). The conscription conflict and the great War. Monash University Publishing.
  • Archer, Robin, Scalmer, Sean (2016). The most interesting experiment that has ever been made in a political democracy: Conscription and the Great War. In Archer, Robin, Damousi, Joy, Goot, Murray, Scalmer, Sean (Eds.), The Conscription Conflict and the Great War . Monash University Press.
  • Archer, Robin (2014). Stopping war and stopping conscription: Australian Labour's response to World War I in comparative perspective. Labour History, (106), 43-67. https://doi.org/10.5263/labourhistory.106.0043
  • Archer, Robin (2013). From an aristocratic anachronism to a democratic dilemma: an elected House of Lords and the lessons from Australia. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 51(3), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2013.805537
  • Archer, Robin (2013). The lost world of American conservatism: the party of order and the fear of freedom. Journal of Political Ideologies, 18(2), 200-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2013.784011
  • Archer, Robin (2013). The state and its unions: reassessing the antecedents, development, and consequences of New Deal labor law. Labor History, 54(2), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2013.773145
  • Archer, Robin (2012). Free riding on revolution: conservatism and social change. In Go, Julian (Ed.), Political Power and Social Theory (pp. 3-26). Emerald Books.
  • Archer, Robin (2011-10-12) The party of order and the fear of freedom: American Conservatism and state violence [Other]. Nuffield Sociology Seminars, Oxford, United Kingdom, GBR.
  • Archer, Robin (2010). Freedom, democracy, and capitalism: ethics and employee participation. In Wilkinson, Adrian, Gollan, Paul J., Marchington, Mick, Lewin, David (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organizations . Oxford University Press.
  • Archer, Robin (2010). Seymour Martin Lipset and political sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 61(s1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01298.x
  • Archer, Robin (2008). Why is there no labor party in the United States? Princeton University Press.
  • Archer, Robin (2001). Does repression help to create labor parties? The effect of police and military intervention on unions in the United States and Australia. Studies in American Political Development, 15(2), 189-219. https://doi.org/10.1017.S0898588X01000049
  • Archer, Robin (2001). Secularism and sectarianism in India and the West: what are the real lessons of American history? Economy and Society, 30(3), 273-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140120071198
    • Public
  • Archer, Robin (2020). The appeal to honour and the decision for war. Journal of Historical Sociology, 33(2), 248 - 262. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12274 picture_as_pdf
  • Archer, Robin (2018). Liberty and loyalty: the Great War and Labour's conscription dilemma. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 64(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12460
  • Archer, Robin (2014). The First World War was a war of choice.
  • Archer, Robin (2012). The Australian experience shows how an elected House of Lords may present a democratic dilemma.
  • Archer, Robin (2011). The legitimacy of capitalism is again in doubt: Labour could use this opportunity to achieve real social and economic change by drawing on strength from outside of parliament as well as from within.
  • Archer, Robin (2010). How to lead the Labour party: it’s not only about winning office, but about defining the political spectrum and reshaping British society.