LSE creators

Number of items: 48.
None
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Tinkler, Jane (2020). Maximizing the impacts of academic research: how to grow the recognition, influence, practical application and public understanding of science and scholarship. Macmillan Education.
  • Bastow, Simon, Dunleavy, Patrick, Tinkler, Jane (2014). The impact of the social sciences: how academics and their research make a difference. SAGE Publications.
  • Tinkler, Jane (2013). Championing and governing UK public service mutuals. In Valkama, Pekka, Bailey, Stephen J., Anttiroiko, Ari-Veikko (Eds.), Organizational Innovation in Public Services: Forms and Governance . Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Bastow, Simon, Tinkler, Jane, Goldchluck, Sofia, Towers, Ed (2010). Joining up citizen redress in UK central government. In Adler, Michael (Ed.), Administrative Justice in Context (pp. 421-456). Hart Publishing.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen, Bastow, Simon, Tinkler, Jane (2008). Australian e-Government in comparative perspective. Australian Journal of Political Science, 43(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140701842540
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen, Bastow, Simon, Tinkler, Jane (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state and e-government. Oxford University Press.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen, Bastow, Simon, Tinkler, Jane (2006). New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
    • Public
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Tinkler, Jane (20 November 2020) The impacts agenda is an autonomous push for opening up and democratizing academia, not part of a neo-liberal hegemony. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Tinkler, Jane (13 September 2020) Book review: The impact agenda: controversies, consequences and challenges by Katherine E. Smith, Justyna Bandola-Gill, Nasar Meer, Ellen Stewart and Richard Watermeyer. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Tinkler, Jane (25 August 2020) Book review: The impact agenda: controversies, consequences and challenges by Katherine E. Smith, Justyna Bandola-Gill, Nasar Meer, Ellen Stewart and Richard Watermeyer. LSE Review of Books. picture_as_pdf
  • Tinkler, Jane (14 November 2016) Surviving work as an academic in the age of measuring impact. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Tinkler, Jane (2016). Announcing the Nine Dots Prize – tackling social issues through creative thinking.
  • Tinkler, Jane (2015). Rather than narrow our definition of impact, we should use metrics to explore richness and diversity of outcomes.
  • Public Policy Group, LSE (2014). Should self-citations be included or excluded from measures of academic performance?
  • Tinkler, Jane (2014). The Impact of Social Sciences Project by the numbers: encouraging real-time impact recording.
  • Tinkler, Jane (2014). PASC support for the creation of a single Public Services Ombudsman for England is welcome and timely.
  • Tinkler, Jane (2014). BIS report on UK Research Councils: Drop in income sees fewer researchers supported but more knowledge created.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Bastow, Simon, Tinkler, Jane (2014). The contemporary social sciences are now converging strongly with STEM disciplines in the study of ‘human-dominated systems’ and ‘human-influenced systems’.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Tinkler, Jane (2012). REF Advice Notes 3: What will Hefce count as ‘under-pinning’ research?
  • Tinkler, Jane (27 March 2012) The REF doesn’t capture what government wants from academics or how academic impact on policymaking takes place. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. picture_as_pdf
  • Tinkler, Jane (2012). Localism may actually reduce citizen voice because information on citizen redress is either not collected or ignored.
  • Tinkler, Jane (2012). Getting Whitehall to incorporate new IT developments in public services remains an uphill struggle: the government now lags ten years behind the private sector in its use of social media and lack of feedback to users.
  • Tinkler, Jane (2011). Book review: the Ombudsman enterprise and administrative justice.
  • Tinkler, Jane (2011). Slashing the welfare budget versus “we are all in this together”: the cumulative effect of cuts is more serious than has yet been admitted.
  • Tinkler, Jane (2011). First impressions of Google Scholar Citations are good: it’s easy to use and accurate.
  • Tinkler, Jane (2011). Ten years after tax, social security departments in the USA and elsewhere are moving cautiously online. The UK is pioneering ‘digital by default’ services and the advent of a universal credit at DWP could be an opportunity for breakthrough progress.
  • Rainford, Paul, Tinkler, Jane (2011-05-25) Integrating healthcare through design [Other]. Innovating through Design in Public Services Seminar Series 2010-2011: Seminar 6: Integrating healthcare through design, London, United Kingdom, GBR.
  • Rainford, Paul, Tinkler, Jane (2011-03-30) Designing digital public services [Other]. Innovating through Design in Public Services Seminar Series 2010-2011: Seminar 5 : Designing digital public services.
  • Rainford, Paul, Tinkler, Jane (2011). Think before you nudge: the benefits and pitfalls of behavioural public policy.
  • Rainford, Paul, Tinkler, Jane (2011-02-23) Designing for nudge effects: how behaviour management can ease public sector problems [Other]. Innovating through Design in Public Services Seminar Series 2010-2011: Seminar 4: Designing for nudge effects: how behaviour management can ease public sector problems.
  • Rainford, Paul, Tinkler, Jane (2011). New ‘big society’ providers could deliver better local services, but there are grave concerns surrounding funding, accountability and citizen redress.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Rainford, Paul, Tinkler, Jane (2011). Innovating out of austerity in local government: a SWOT analysis. London School of Economics and Political Science.
  • Gilson, Christopher, Tinkler, Jane (2010). Reviewing 2010 in political blogging: the spotlight moves from the Tories to the Liberal Democrats.
  • Rainford, Paul, Tinkler, Jane (2010-12-09) Designing 'Big Society' service provision [Other]. Innovating through Design in Public Services Seminar Series 2010-2011: Seminar 2: Designing 'Big Society' Service Provision, London, United Kingdom, GBR.
  • Rainford, Paul, Tinkler, Jane (2010-11-17) Innovating in public sector procurement [Other]. Innovating through Design in Public Services Seminar Series 2010-2011: Seminar 1: Innovating in Public Sector Procurement, London, United Kingdom, GBR.
  • Tinkler, Jane (2010). Cuts to front line policing may lead to a poorer service, but will citizens be able to navigate the convoluted police complaints systems to do anything about it?
  • Tinkler, Jane (2010). UK government on the internet is still costly and of ‘variable to poor’ quality.
  • Tinkler, Jane (2010). Benefit fraud is already low: to save real money the government should concentrate on the errors.
  • Tinkler, Jane, Dunleavy, Patrick (2010). How radical is “radical efficiency”?: can it still be useful in a time of cuts?
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Gilson, Christopher, Bastow, Simon, Tinkler, Jane (2009). The National Audit Office, the Public Accounts Committee and the risk landscape in UK public policy. The Risk and Regulation Advisory Council.
  • Raraty, David, Dorrell, David, Dunleavy, Patrick, Goldchluk, Sofia, Khan, Mohammed Khalid, Tinkler, Jane, Towers, Ed, Margetts, Helen, Escher, Tobias & Reissfelder, Stephane et al (2009). Department for Work and Pensions: communicating with customers. (Report by the comptroller and auditor general HC 421 Session 2008-2009). Stationery Office.
  • LSE Public Policy Group, Jane (2008). Maximizing the social, policy and economic impacts of research in the humanities and social sciences. London School of Economics and Political Science. Public Policy Group.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Bastow, Simon, Tinkler, Jane (2008). The impact and value of the Foresight research programme: report to Foresight from the LSE Public Policy Group. London School of Economics and Political Science. Public Policy Group. picture_as_pdf
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen, Bastow, Simon, Pearce, Oliver, Tinkler, Jane (2007). Government on the internet: progress in delivering information and services online. (House of Commons Papers HC 529 2006-2007). Stationery Office.
  • Bastow, Simon, Dunleavy, Patrick, Pearce, Oliver, Tinkler, Jane (2006). A review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) for the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. London School of Economics and Political Science. Public Policy Group.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen, Bastow, Simon, Tinkler, Jane, Pearce, Oliver, Bartholomeou, Patricia (2006). Achieving innovation in central government organisations. Stationery Office.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Loughlin, Martin, Margetts, Helen, Bastow, Simon, Tinkler, Jane, Pearce, Oliver, Bartholomeou, Patricia (2005). Citizen redress: what citizens can do if things go wrong in the public services. Stationery Office.
  • Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen, Escher, Tobias, Hale, Scott, Tinkler, Jane, Bastow, Simon (1999). Government on the web: about. Oxford Internet Institute, LSE Public Policy Group.