Items where department is "Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Sciences (CPNSS)"

University Structure (106206) LSE (106206) Research Centres (22374)
Number of items: 30.
A
  • Adler, Matthew D (2018). Prioritarianism room for desert? Utilitas, 30(2), 172-197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820817000164
  • Anand, Paul, Boarini, Romina, Canaviri, Jose Antonio, Dorji, Lham, Gärtner, Kathrin, Helgeson, Thomas, Helliwell, John F., Hunt, Guinevere, Konoshonok, Inna & O’ Donnell, Gus et al (2018). The global analysis of wellbeing report 2018: from measurement to policy and practice. Oxford Foundation of Knowledge Exchange.
  • Greene, Catherine (2018). Information in financial markets. In Addison, Mark, Gobet, Fernand, Sozou, Peter D. (Eds.), Scientific discovery in the social sciences . Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. picture_as_pdf
    • B
  • Barrotta, Pierluigi, Montuschi, Eleonora (2018). The dam project: who are the experts? In Barrotta, Pierluigi, Scarafile, Giovanni (Eds.), Science and Democracy: Controversies and Conflicts (pp. 17-34). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Browning, Heather (2018). No room at the zoo: management euthanasia and animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(4), 483 - 498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9741-8
  • Browning, Heather (2018). Zoo ethics the challenges of compassionate conservation. By Jenny Gray; foreword by Joel Sartore. Clayton South (Australia): CSIRO; Ithaca (New York): Cornell University Press (Comstock Publishing Associates). $45.00. xix + 236 p.; index. ISBN: 9781486306985 (CSIRO); 9781501714429 (Cornell). 2017. Quarterly Review of Biology, 93(2), 149 - 149. https://doi.org/10.1086/698059
  • Gold, Natalie (2018). Putting willpower into decision theory: the person as a team over time and intrapersonal team reasoning. In Bermúdez, José Luis (Ed.), Self-Control, Decision Theory, and Rationality: New Essays (pp. 218 - 239). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108329170.011 picture_as_pdf
  • Rowe, Thomas, Beard, Simon (2018). Probabilities, methodologies and the evidence base in existential risk assessments. (Working paper). Centre for the Study of Existential Risk.
  • Stuart, Michael T. (2018). How thought experiments increase understanding. In Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach, Brown, James Robert (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments . Routledge. picture_as_pdf
    • C
  • Cao, Tian Yu (2018). Scientific realism in the post-Kuhnian times. In Wuppuluri, Shyam, Dorio, Francisco Antonio (Eds.), The Map and the Territory: Exploring the Foundations of Science, Thought and Reality (pp. 101 - 123). Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. picture_as_pdf
  • Cartwright, Nancy, Pemberton, John, Wieten, Sarah (2018). Mechanisms, ceteris paribus laws and covering-law explanation. Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, LSE. picture_as_pdf
  • Cecchi, Ariel S. (2018). Cognitive penetration of early vision in face perception. Consciousness and Cognition, 63, 254-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.06.005
  • Crean, Aisling, Gold, Natalie, Vines, David, Williamson, Annie (2018). Restoring trustworthiness in the financial system: norms, behaviour and governance. Journal of the British Academy, 6(s1), 131 - 155. https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/006s1.131
    • D
  • Dietrich, Franz, List, Christian (2018). From degrees of belief to binary beliefs: lessons from judgment-aggregation theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 115(5), 225 - 270. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2018115516
  • Dymitruk, Maria, Markovich, Réka, Liepiņa, Rūta, El Ghosh, Mirna, van Doesburg, Robert, Governatori, Guido, Verheij, Bart (2018). Research in progress: report on the ICAIL 2017 doctoral consortium. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 26(1), 49-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9220-6
    • G
  • Gold, Natalie (2018). Collective rationality a dilemma for democrats but a solution for deliberation? In van Aaken, Anne, List, Christine (Eds.), Deliberation and decision: a dialogue between economics, constitutional theory and deliberative democracy . Routledge.
  • Gold, Natalie (2018). The Origins of Behavioural Public Policy, Adam Oliver. Cambridge University Press, 2017, 252 pages. Economics and Philosophy, 34(2), 267 - 274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267118000135 picture_as_pdf
  • Gold, Natalie (2018). Team reasoning: controversies and open research questions. In Jankovic, Marija, Ludwig, Kirk (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality . Routledge. picture_as_pdf
  • Greene, Catherine (2018). Mind the gap: virtue ethics and financial crisis. Midwest Studies In Philosophy, 42(1), 174-190.
  • Güttinger, Stephan (2018). Replications everywhere. BioEssays, 40(7), p. 1800055. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201800055
  • Sala, Giovanni, Tatlidil, K. Semir, Gobet, Fernand (2018). Video game training does not enhance cognitive ability: a comprehensive meta-analytic investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 144(2), 111 - 139. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000139 picture_as_pdf
    • K
  • Kinouchi, Renato (2018). Philosophical issues related to risks and values. Filosofia Unisinos, 19(3), 235-240. https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2018.193.06 picture_as_pdf
  • Kinouchi, Renato (2018). Sobre as Limitações do Dilema do Bonde para a Avaliação dos Riscos Impostos por Veículos Autônomos. Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea, 6(2), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v6i2.22105 picture_as_pdf
  • Krauss, Alexander (2018). Why all randomised controlled trials produce biased results. Annals of Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2018.1453233 picture_as_pdf
    • L
  • List, Christian (2018). What is it like to be a group agent? Noûs, 52(2), 295-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12162
    • P
  • Parker, Matthew W. (2018). Symmetry arguments against regular probability: a reply to recent objections. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 9(8), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-018-0229-1 picture_as_pdf
  • Plebani, Matteo (2018). Sosein as subject matter. The Australasian Journal of Logic, 15(2), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v15i2.4857
  • Suárez, Mauricio, Pero, Francesca (2018). The representational semantic conception. Philosophy of Science, 86(2), 344-365. https://doi.org/10.1086/702029 picture_as_pdf
    • S
  • Salis, Fiora (2018). Scientific discovery through fictionally modelling reality. Topoi, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9582-0
  • Suárez, Mauricio (2018). The chances of propensities. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(4), 1155-1177. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx010